Diffused fiber-optic horticultural lighting

ABSTRACT

Laser light emanates from optical components that are mounted on a substrate, each optical component being coupled to an optical fiber that delivers laser radiation combined from multiple lasers. A linear or elliptical holographic diffuser is located to diffuse the light emanating from the optical components. The laser wavelengths excite plant photopigments for predetermined physiological responses, and the light source intensities may be temporally modulated to maximize photosynthesis and control photomorphogenesis responses. Each laser is independently controlled.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The subject matter of the present invention relates to a system of providing optical radiation to plants grown in controlled environments. More specifically, it relates to providing diffused laser light of particular wavelengths that is delivered by optic fibers.

BACKGROUND

It is becoming increasingly economical to grow plants in controlled environments such as greenhouses and plant factories. In these environments, horticultural luminaires are typically mounted above the planting beds, although inter-row lighting is sometimes used for trellised plants such as vine tomatoes.

Before the introduction of light-emitting diode (LED) technology, horticultural luminaires typically used fluorescent or high-pressure sodium (HPS) lamps to provide sufficient optical radiation (“light”) for the plants to perform photosynthesis while growing. In addition, incandescent lamps were sometimes used to advance or delay flowering in plants such as poinsettia. Regardless of the technology, the lamp spectral power distribution (SPD) and photosynthetic photon flux (PPF) emitted by the lamps were fixed parameters.

The first generation of LED-based horticultural luminaires employed blue and red LEDs whose narrow-band spectral emissions were chosen to match the spectral absorption peaks of chlorophyll A and B (FIG. 1), the reasoning being that this would result in the most efficient use of the photon flux for plant photosynthesis. It was also helpful in that the absorption peaks of approximately 450 nm (blue) and 660 nm (red) coincided with the peak efficacies of industry-standard InGaN and AlInGaP inorganic LED technologies (FIG. 4).

Some manufacturers now offer second-generation horticultural luminaires with LED peak wavelengths ranging from 400 nm (blue) to 750 nm (far-red), including broadband “white” light from phosphor-coated LEDs. A few horticultural luminaire manufacturers further include ultraviolet LEDs in their products, including UV-B (280 nm to 315 nm) and UV-A (315 nm to 400 nm), while others offer different fixed SPDs designed to promote vegetative growth or flowering.

Recent horticultural research has shown, however, that plants have a much more complex relationship with the spectral power distribution of incident optical radiation than has previously been recognized. In addition to photosynthesis, the spectral power distribution also influences photomorphogenesis, phototropism, shade avoidance, secondary metabolite production, pest resistance, circadian rhythm entrainment, and more.

Recent horticultural research has also shown that the spatial and temporal distribution of optical radiation has significant influence on plant growth and health. Inter-row lighting is an example of spatial distribution, where horizontally-oriented optical radiation incident on the leaves of closely-spacing trellised vine tomatoes has been shown to improve yield and fruit quality. Similarly, varying the daily photoperiod during the growth cycle is an example of temporal distribution, where shortening the photoperiod from 16 hours to 12 hours during flowering has been shown to influence the production of tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCa) in Cannabis sativa crops.

Unfortunately, prior art horticultural luminaires do not provide the means of precisely controlling the spectral power, spatial and temporal distributions of optical radiation needed to realize the benefits of improved plant growth and health in controlled environments as evidenced by this recent research.

Prior art horticultural luminaires have until recently consisted of either HPS or metal halide (MH) arc lamps with rotationally symmetric reflectors and refractive optics, or linear fluorescent lamps with reflectors and diffusers. Arc lamps produce large amounts of infrared radiation and conductive heat, and so the luminaires must typically be positioned at least several meters above the plant canopy in greenhouses and vertical farms to avoid overheating the plant leaves and flowers. It is difficult to control the spatial intensity distribution of the photosynthetic photon flux, and so the luminaires are typically arranged in a grid pattern simply to provide spatially even photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) on the plant canopy from overhead. HPS and MH lamps are further limited in that they cannot be dimmed, and their spectral power distributions are fixed.

Linear fluorescent lamps do not produce significant amount of infrared radiation or conductive heat, and so can be positioned within centimeters of the plant canopy. However, each lamp can produce only a limited amount of photosynthetic photon flux, making them unsuitable for use in greenhouses where PPFD levels comparable to daylight are typically required. Their spectral power distributions are also fixed, and their linear form factor makes it difficult to control their spatial intensity distributions.

Linear horticultural luminaires with high-flux LEDs are commercially available, such as the Arize Lynk™ from Current by GE, that provide blue and red semiconductor LEDs in combination with phosphor-coated white light LEDs. Their spectral power distributions, however, are fixed, and they do not provide collimation optics to achieve spatial intensity distributions substantially different from that of linear fluorescent lamps.

Prior to their discontinuation as legal products, incandescent lamps were used to control flowering of ornamental plants such as poinsettia. Edison-base LED lamps such as the Arize™ Greenhouse Pro from Current by GE are available to fulfill this role, but their form factor makes it difficult to control their spatial intensity distributions, and their spectral power distributions are fixed.

Some commercially-available horticultural luminaires provide a choice of vegetative (“veg”) or flowering (“bloom”) spectral power distributions, and are capable of being dimmed remotely, such as for example the TopLight™ luminaire and associated smartPAR™ control software from LumiGrow (Emeryville, Calif.).

LED-based horticultural luminaires designed specifically for research and development are available, such as for example the PHYTOFY RL™ from OSRAM (Munich, Germany). This particular product includes an array of five different quasimonochromatic LEDs with nominal peak wavelengths at 385 nm (ultraviolet-A), 450 nm (blue), 521 nm (green), 660 nm (red), and 735 nm (far-red), as well as phosphor-coated white light LEDs with a correlated color temperature of 2700K. The LEDs are controlled by six independent pulse-width modulation (PWM) drivers, each with a dimming range of 10 to 100 percent, which enables researchers to generate a variety of spectral power distributions and PPFD levels on the plant canopy that can be varied by software executed on a remote computer and communicating with the drivers through a network interface.

There are a number of disadvantages to such horticultural luminaires. First, each high-flux LED is mounted in its own package and affixed to a common heat sink. This makes it difficult to control the spatial intensity distribution of the luminaire. Second, the LEDs cannot be arranged in a linear array without large variations in spectral power distribution along the length of the luminaire. Assuming for example a 2.0 centimeter spacing between LED packages, the six LEDs would span 12 centimeters and require a distance of at least five times (i.e., 60 centimeters) to ensure an approximately constant spectral power distribution on the plant canopy.

A third disadvantage is that each LED package must be electrically and thermally connected to a large and expensive metal-core circuit board to provide electrical power and extract the generated heat using passive or actively-cooled heat sinks. Active cooling using electrically-powered fans is a particular problem in greenhouses, where the luminaire housings are typically subjected to high humidity, dripping water, and possibly water-jet washing.

Even with active cooling, the maximum photosynthetic photon flux that can be generated by an LED-based horticultural luminaire is limited by the ability of the cooling system to extract conductive heat from the LED packages. Water cooling is an option, but this involves water supply and return lines that must be routed between each luminaire and a central pump and heat exchanger.

A fourth disadvantage is that semiconductor LED manufacturers cannot precisely control the peak wavelengths of their products, and so must “bin” LED die with similar wavelengths during the packaging process. The smaller the range of acceptable peak wavelengths within each bin, the lower the production yield and the higher the product cost.

This is significant in that the absorption spectra of plant photopigments typically exhibit narrow distributions. For example, the spectral absorption of chlorophyll A in FIG. 1 has a full-width half-maximum (FWHM) value of only 15 nm at 660 nm, while chlorophyll B similarly has a FWHM value of 15 nm at 435 nm. For comparison, LUXEON Rebel™ color LEDs as manufactured by Lumileds (San Jose, Calif.) are binned in 5 nm increments for blue (e.g., 440 nm to 445 nm), but 10 nm increments for red (e.g., 650 nm to 660 nm). Botanical studies such as Johkan, M., et al. 2012. “Effects of Green Light Wavelength and Intensity on Photomorphogenesis and Photosynthesis in Lactuca sativa,” Environmental and Experimental Botany 75:128-133, have shown that differences in peak wavelength as small as 10 nm can have marked deleterious effects on the growth and health of plants grown in controlled environments.

A fifth disadvantage is that even with multiple independently-controlled LED drivers, the spectral power distribution is limited to a combination of the emissions from quasimonochromatic LEDs with fixed center wavelengths and broadband phosphor-coated LEDs with fixed SPDs. Recent research has shown that different plant species respond to combinations of different wavelengths. The “Emerson effect” is a well-known example, where the addition of red light has been shown to increase the efficacy of photosynthesis in plants exposed to broadband (400 nm to 700 nm) optical radiation. More recent studies have shown that varying the ratio of red to blue light influences vegetative growth and flowering, adding green light to white light tends to promote photosynthetic activity, varying the ratio of red to far-red light triggers seed germination and advances or delays flowering, ultraviolet radiation promotes the production of flavonoids and other secondary metabolites while limiting vegetative growth and increasing resistance to pests and fungal infections, and more.

FIG. 1 shows the spectral absorptances in vitro of chlorophyll A and B, while FIG. 2 shows the spectral absorptances of the P_(r) and P_(r) isoforms of phytochrome and FIG. 3 shows the spectral absorptances of UV RESISTANCE LOCUS 8 (UVR8) and beta-carotene. Common to all of these photopigments are markedly rapid changes in spectral absorptance with wavelength, emphasizing the need to “tune” the peak wavelengths of narrowband LEDs or monochromatic lasers to excite these pigments with maximum efficacy. For example, irradiating UVR8 with 295 nm ultraviolet-B radiation is only 50 percent as effective as irradiation with 280 nm radiation.

These photopigments are further only the most well-known and studied for their involvement in photosynthesis (chlorophylls A and B and beta-carotene), photomorphogenesis (phytochrome), and UVR8 (ultraviolet radiation protection). Other plant photopigments include cryptochromes (involved in circadian and circannual rhythms), other carotenes (photosynthesis), xanthophylls (light energy modulation and photosynthesis), anthocyanins (nutrient recovery and pollination attractants), and phototropins (phototropism). Altogether, there are hundreds of known plant photopigments, many with as-yet-unknown functions. More importantly, the Emerson effects and other physiological responses to different spectral power distributions show that there are likely many as-yet undiscovered interactions between plant pigments and their effect on plant health and growth.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

The inventors have recognized a need for a horticultural luminaire that provides improved control over the spectrum that is used to illuminate the plants, and that narrowband optical radiation, and monochromatic radiation from laser sources in particular, offer the best opportunities to limiting crosstalk between plant photopigments, both when studying their interactions and also in growing plants in controlled environments.

A linear array of optical elements is optically coupled via fiber optic cables to one or more laser light sources, and are housed within a hollow linear optic with a holographic diffuser. Laser wavelengths are chosen to maximally excite plant photopigments for predetermined physiological responses, and the light source intensities may be temporally modulated to maximize photosynthesis and control photomorphogenesis responses.

Disclosed herein is a horticultural lighting assembly comprising: one or more optical components mounted on a substrate and each optically coupled to at least one optical fiber that delivers laser radiation to the optical component; and a linear or elliptical holographic diffuser located to diffuse light emanating from said optical components.

Also disclosed herein is a horticultural lighting system comprising: one or more optical components mounted on a substrate; at least one optical fiber coupled to each optical component; a linear or elliptical holographic diffuser located to diffuse light emanating from said optical components; and one or more laser light modules optically coupled to said optical fibers.

Further disclosed herein is a method for inducing a predetermined physiological response in a plant comprising; (a) determining wavelengths suitable to excite photopigments in the plant to cause the predetermined physiological response; (b) providing a horticultural lighting system having a lighting assembly comprising: one or more optical components mounted on a substrate; at least one optical fiber coupled to each optical component; and a linear or elliptical holographic diffuser located to diffuse light emanating from said optical components; and also having one or more laser light modules optically coupled to said optical fibers, wherein each laser light module generates composite monochromatic optical radiation with the wavelengths, the wavelengths being within a range of 280 nm to 3000 nm; (c) locating the lighting assembly to illuminate the plant; and (d) driving lasers in the laser light modules to generate the composite monochromatic optical radiation.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows the spectral absorptances of chlorophyll photopigments.

FIG. 2 shows the spectral absorptances of phytochrome photopigments.

FIG. 3 shows the spectral absorptances of beta-carotene and UVR8 photopigments.

FIG. 4 shows the spectral power distributions of various semiconductor LEDs.

FIG. 5 shows an embodiment of a laser light module, according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 6 shows an embodiment of the horticultural lighting assembly with a linear array of fiber optics optically coupled to one or more laser light sources, according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 7 shows different angular diffusion distributions from linear or elliptical holographic diffusers.

FIG. 8 shows a block diagram of a control system for the horticultural lighting system, according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 9 shows a flowchart for use of the horticultural lighting system, according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 10 is a flowchart of operation of the control system, according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 11 shows a horticultural lighting assembly mounted vertically as inter-row lighting.

FIG. 12 shows a horticultural lighting assembly mounted horizontally as inter-row lighting.

FIG. 13 shows a horticultural lighting assembly mounted horizontally as overhead lighting.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Glossary

Composite monochromatic radiation—Polychromatic radiation made up of multiple monochromatic or narrow-band spectra, such as, for example, the combined light produced by two different types of laser.

LED—Light-emitting diode

PPFD—Photosynthetic photon flux density

SPD—Spectral power distribution

System

FIG. 5 shows a laser module 500 that has one or more laser light sources 505 a-e, each of which emits monochromatic radiation with a different wavelength. This radiation is received by a diffractive optic beam splitter 510 a-e (e.g., Golub, M. A. “Laser Beam Splitting by Diffractive Optics,” Optics & Photonics News, February 2004, pp. 36-41), that splits the incident beam into two or more diffraction orders. These divergent beams are then collimated by a refractive or diffractive optical element 515 a-e and incident upon a mirror 520 a or dual-band dichroic mirror 520 b-e that reflects the monochromatic radiation while passing other wavelengths. The result is that individual divergent beams from each of the diffractive optic beam splitters 510 a-e are combined to form a combined beam 522. Each combined beam 522 includes radiation from each of the laser light sources 505 a-e. Each combined beam 522 is then received by an optical fiber 524 in fiber optic assembly 525. The optic fibers 524 form a bundle 528 for delivering the composite monochromatic radiation.

It is currently assumed that the wavelength range of photobiologically active radiation for plants is 280 nm to 800 nm. However, medical studies such as, for example, Karu, T. I. 2008, “Mitochondrial Signaling in Mammalian Cells Activated by Red and Near-IR,”, Photochemistry and Photobiology 84(5):1091-1099, indicate that cytochrome c oxidase (CCO), a protein complex present in the mitochondria of mammalian cells that have a spectral absorption peak at approximately 820 nm, increase adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production when irradiated by near-infrared radiation. These studies have been used to explain the benefits of photobiomodulation using near-infrared lasers or LEDs, an alternative medicine for humans and animals. However, CCO is an essential component of the respiration of all eukaryotic cells, including plants, as shown for example by Dahan, J. et al. 2014. “Disruption of the CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE DEFICIENT1 Gene Leads to Cytochrome c Oxidase Depletion and Reorchestrated Respiratory Metabolism in Arabidopsis,” Plant Physiology 166:1788-1802. (Other mechanisms have also been proposed, as reviewed in, for example, de Freitas, L. F. et al. 2016, “Proposed Mechanisms of Photobiomodulation of Low-Light Level Therapy,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 22(3):7000417.) Plants in general may therefore benefit from, and indeed require, near-infrared radiation for optimum growth and health. Such radiation may be generated, for example, by gallium arsenide (GaAs), aluminum gallium arsenide (AlGaAs), gallium antimonide (GaSb), or gallium indium arsenide antimonide (GaInAsSb) semiconductor LEDs or laser diodes. The wavelengths of the laser light sources 505 a-e may therefore include any wavelength in the range of 280 nm to 3000 nm.

FIG. 6 shows a horticultural lighting assembly 600 (or luminaire). The lighting assembly 600 is optically coupled to one or more laser modules 500 via optical fiber bundle 528, which includes one or more optical fibers 524, wherein the laser modules 500 are located either within the luminaire housing or at a remote location. If at a remote location, it is easier to dissipate the heat generated by the lasers and reduce its influence on the plants. One or more optical components 630 are mounted on a substrate 640 and optically coupled to the optical fibers 524. The optical components 630 distribute the composite monochromatic radiation transmitted by the optical fibers 524 in a desired angular distribution.

In one embodiment, optical components 630 include diffusers that optionally include an inorganic or organic luminophore, such as for example an yttrium-aluminum-garnet (YAG) phosphor or a fluorescent dye, to absorb a portion of the composite monochromatic radiation coupled from optical fibers 524 and emit a broadband optical wavelength range.

As used herein, “phosphor” refers to any material that shifts the wavelengths of light irradiating it and/or that is fluorescent and/or phosphorescent, and is utilized interchangeably with the term “light-conversion material.” As used herein, a “phosphor” may refer to only the powder or particles or to the powder or particles with the binder. The specific components and/or formulation of the phosphor and/or binder material are not limitations of the present invention. The binder may also be referred to as an encapsulant or a matrix material. A “luminophore” is an atom or functional group in a chemical compound that is responsible for its luminescent properties.

In another embodiment, optical components 630 include a holographic diffuser or are located below a holographic diffuser 645 (e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 7,255,458, System and Method for the Diffusion of Illumination Produced by Discrete Light Sources) with a linear or elliptical diffusion pattern that is oriented in direction 650. The angular diffusion in direction 650 may exhibit different patterns. As shown in FIG. 7, these patterns may include a narrow beam distribution 710, a broad cosine distribution 720, or a batwing distribution 730.

Referring again to FIG. 6, the optical radiation emitted from optical components 630 is incident upon another holographic diffuser 660, which has a linear or elliptical diffusion pattern that is oriented in direction 670, orthogonal to direction 650. In one embodiment, the holographic diffuser 660 is formed into a hemicylinder that is mechanically connected to substrate 640. Similar to optical components 630 that include holographic diffusers or are located below a holographic diffuser 645, holographic diffuser 660 may exhibit, as shown in FIG. 7 a narrow beam distribution 710, a broad cosine distribution 720, or a batwing distribution 730.

The holographic diffuser 660 serves an entirely different function to the apparatus disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,255,458. The purpose of the prior art invention is to generate the visual appearance of the discrete LEDs as a linear line source, whereas the present invention uses the diffusion of optical radiation from holographic diffuser 660 (and optionally in combination with optical components 630 when including holographic diffusers, or in combination with holographic diffuser 645) to produce a constant PPFD at a reasonably close distance from the luminaire along its length, rather than “hot spots” created by the optical components 630 that act as discrete emitters.

A specific, non-limiting example of the lasers and phosphors in a laser module 500 for a horticultural lighting assembly 600 includes an InGaN blue-violet laser diode with a wavelength selected from the range of 400 nm to 410 nm, an InGaN blue laser diode with a wavelength selected from the range of 445 nm to 465 nm, an InGaN green laser diode with a wavelength selected from the range of 510 nm to 540 nm, an AlInGaP red laser diode with a wavelength selected from the range of 650 nm to 670 nm, an AlGaAs far-red laser diode with a wavelength selected from the range of 720 nm to 750 nm, and one or more phosphors such as, for example, cerium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Cr:YAG) or europium/dysprosium-doped strontium aluminate (Eu,Dy:SrAl₂O₄).

The radiant flux emitted by laser light sources 505 a-e of FIG. 5 may be individually modulated to achieve a composite monochromatic spectral power distribution as delivered to fiber optic assembly 525. In an embodiment of the control system 800 of the horticultural lighting system, shown in FIG. 8, one or more laser light sources 845 a-e are electrically connected to laser drivers 840 a-e, which may temporally modulate the radiant flux of each of the laser light sources by means of, for example, digital pulse width modulation or analog current control. Each driver 840 a-e is electrically connected to controller 810, which may receive input signals from one of more sensors 820, including for example optical radiation sensors, daylight photosensors or pyranometers, temperature sensors, and relative humidity sensors, and also from timer 830.

As reported by Kanechi, M. et al. 2016. “Effects of Pulsed Lighting Bases Light-emitting Diodes on the Growth and Photosynthesis of Lettuce Leaves,” Acta Horticulturae 1134, photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) modulated at a rate of microseconds to milliseconds improves the photosynthesis efficiency. Also, as reported by Shimada, A. et al. 2011. “Red and Blue Pulse Timing Control for Pulse Width Modulation Light Dimming of Light Emitting Diodes for Plant Cultivation,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiolology B-Biology, 104:399-404, the phase difference between pulses of different colors may either increase or decrease the rate of plant growth.

The radiant flux emitted by laser light sources 845 a-e (and 505 a-e of FIG. 5) is therefore modulated in some embodiments at a rate of microseconds to milliseconds, wherein the modulation phase and frequency of each wavelength may be independently varied.

As reported by Harun, A. et al. 2013. “Red and Blue LED with Pulse Lighting Control Treatment for Brassica Chinensis in Indoor Farming,” Proc. 2013 IEEE Conference on Open Systems, pp. 231-236, pulses of one hour of light followed by 15 minutes of darkness more than tripled the rate of photosynthesis. The radiant flux emitted by laser light sources 845 a-e (and 505 a-e of FIG. 5) is therefore modulated in some embodiments at a rate of seconds to minutes to simulate “sun flecks,” brief occurrences in solar irradiance that occur in forest understories when sunlight is able to directly reach the ground.

Method

Referring to FIG. 9, an exemplary method is shown for use of a horticultural lighting system incorporating the laser module 500 and the horticultural lighting assembly 600. In step 900, the wavelengths desired for the particular plant are determined. In step 905, the system is provided with a laser module that can provide the determined wavelengths. In step 910, the horticultural luminaire assembly 600 is located to illuminate the plants from a desired position and direction. In step 915, the desired output powers of each of the lasers in the laser module 500 is determined. In step 920, the laser module is switched on to drive the lasers, illuminating the plants with the desired spectrum and power density. Optionally, the lasers are collectively modulated in step 925 by dimming them temporarily by 10-100% for periods ranging from a timescale of microseconds to minutes.

FIG. 10 shows control steps taken by the control system 800. In step 950, the controller 810 receives a signal from one of the sensors 820 or from the timer 830. In step 955, the controller 810 interprets the signal by comparing it, for example, to a threshold, or by otherwise analyzing it. In step 960, the controller 810 adjusts the power to at least one of the laser drivers 840 a-e in order to modify the output of the corresponding laser light sources 845 a-e.

In an embodiment shown in FIG. 11, the horticultural lighting assembly 600 is oriented vertically and located in proximity to and beside one or more plants 970. In this configuration, the lighting system serves as, for example, inter-row lighting.

In an embodiment shown in FIG. 12, the horticultural lighting assembly 600 is oriented horizontally and located in proximity to and beside one or more plants, 975, 980. In this configuration, the lighting system serves as, for example, inter-row lighting.

In an embodiment shown in FIG. 13, the horticultural lighting assembly 600 is oriented horizontally and located in proximity to and above one or more plants, 985, 990. In this configuration, the lighting system serves as, for example, overhead lighting.

Throughout the description, specific details have been set forth in order to provide a more thorough understanding of the invention. However, the invention may be practiced without these particulars. In other instances, well known elements have not been shown or described in detail and repetitions of steps and features have been omitted to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the invention. Accordingly, the specification is to be regarded in an illustrative, rather than a restrictive, sense.

It will be clear to one having skill in the art that further variations to the specific details disclosed herein can be made, resulting in other embodiments that are within the scope of the invention disclosed. Two or more steps in the flowcharts may be performed in a different order, other steps may be added, or one or more may be removed without altering the main function of the invention. All parameters, and configurations described herein are examples only and actual choices of such depend on the specific embodiment. For example, different numbers of components may be used; diffusers may be spaced differently relative to each other and to the optical elements; or each combined beam may be fed into multiple optic fibers. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is to be construed in accordance with the substance defined by the following claims. 

We claim:
 1. A horticultural lighting system comprising: a laser that produces a laser beam; a diffractive optic beam splitter that splits the laser beam into multiple beams; a substrate; multiple optical components mounted on the substrate; multiple optical fibers, each one of which is coupled to a different one of the optical components and a different one of the multiple beams; and a linear or elliptical holographic diffuser located to diffuse light emanating from said optical components.
 2. The horticultural lighting system of claim 1, comprising a further linear or elliptical holographic diffuser that diffuses light in a direction that is orthogonal to a direction in which the linear or elliptical holographic diffuser diffuses light.
 3. The horticultural lighting system of claim 1, wherein each optical component includes a further linear or elliptical holographic diffuser that diffuses light in a direction that is orthogonal to a direction in which the linear or elliptical holographic diffuser diffuses light.
 4. The holographic lighting system of claim 3, wherein each further linear or elliptical holographic diffuser has a narrow beam, cosine, or batwing distribution.
 5. The horticultural lighting system of claim 1, wherein each optical component includes an organic or inorganic luminophore.
 6. The horticultural lighting system of claim 1, wherein the linear or elliptical holographic diffuser has a narrow beam, cosine, or batwing distribution.
 7. The horticultural lighting system of claim 1, comprising a beam collimator located to collimate each of the multiple beams.
 8. The horticultural lighting system of claim 7, comprising a dual-band dichroic mirror located to combine each of the multiple beams with one of further multiple beams provided by a further laser, further diffractive optic beam splitter and further beam collimator, to result in multiple combined beams; wherein each one of the multiple beams is coupled to its respective optic fiber as part of one of the multiple combined beams.
 9. The horticultural lighting system of claim 1, comprising: a laser driver that temporally modulates a radiant flux emitted by the laser; and a controller that determines said temporal modulation in response to signals received from a timer and one or more sensors.
 10. The horticultural lighting system of claim 1, comprising: one or more further lasers each producing a further laser beam; and one or more further diffractive optic beam splitters each splitting one of the further laser beams into further multiple beams; wherein each optic fiber is coupled to one of the further beams from each of the one or more further lasers.
 11. The horticultural lighting system of claim 10, wherein laser radiation delivered to each optical component from the laser and further lasers has a composite monochromatic spectrum with multiple different monochromatic wavelengths within the range of 280 nm to 3000 nm.
 12. The horticultural lighting system of claim 10, comprising: a plurality of beam collimators each located to collimate the multiple beams from the beam splitter or the further multiple beams from one of the further diffractive optic beam splitters; a plurality of dual-band dichroic mirrors located to combine each of the multiple beams with one of the further multiple beams from each of the further lasers, to result in multiple combined beams; wherein each one of the multiple beams is coupled to its respective optic fiber as part of one of the multiple combined beams.
 13. The horticultural lighting system of claim 12, comprising a fiber optic assembly into which the multiple combined beams are coupled, wherein said optical fibers in part form a portion of the fiber optic assembly.
 14. The horticultural lighting system of claim 10, wherein the laser and further lasers include: an InGaN blue-violet laser diode with a wavelength selected from the range of 400 nm to 410 nm; an InGaN blue laser diode with a wavelength selected from the range of 445 nm to 465 nm; an InGaN green laser diode with a wavelength selected from the range of 510 nm to 540 nm; an AlInGaP red laser diode with a wavelength selected from the range of 650 nm to 670 nm; and an AlGaAs far-red laser diode with a wavelength selected from the range of 720 nm to 750 nm.
 15. The horticultural lighting system of claim 10, wherein a modulation phase and modulation frequency of light emitted from each of the laser and further lasers is independently controlled. 